ATOM -- ATOM
Plus / Essay March 2019
Chapter 91. Link to index
How are the atoms in water held together and by what do they distance themselves to become a vapor known as steam? And still further how by an further increase in heat will these atoms let lose of one another? Then still further how in lowering the temperature to a point in freezing these atoms bind together into a circular form with spacing between them?
Then for still further questions, how do the atoms of steel hold so well together yet expand very little when heated, as in fact most substances do not expand to any great degree when heated, only the lighter elements do. Then there are the molecules of many liquids that do expand upon heating.
And so what is the atom, and what is heating, and what is or by what is the expansion of things?
Does it seem like that our solar system is locked on to other solar systems, or that is has the capacity to lock on to any other solar system? For has not man in his ignorance made the atom after a solar system? If indeed it were, then nothing at all would exist, there be no water, no flesh, no steel no nothing.
It is simply this that man from birth is ignorant and only of his Creator can knowledge and wisdom be found. The atom in all essence is a tiny magnet, that is to say; its coordinate is magnetic, and as such a rotating magnet.
But these words alone do not do it justice since that rotating entity is also a stationary entity, nor is it only singular but manifold as well.
And what may heating be if not motion in the speed or velocity thereof. A spark introduced into a mixture of benzene with air is like a bowling ball at high speed colliding upon the pins. A spark for its extremely high motion drives the atoms to increase their rotational speed to a point where they not only expand but change the molecular format as well.
The factor that makes an atomic explosion so devastating is the degree of movement, that in other terms is called heat, or temperature. The expansion of steam will drive a cylinder, A molecular change in gun powder will make a blast, Dividing the atoms of any molecular form increases the thermal capacity by hundreds and thousand folds.
It all boils down to how ever high and in what time frame any local movement may be raised that determines the degree of the blast or shockwave that then is also understood in temperature. At any single ray of light there is room for more than a trillion wavelets, while then a single light ray from the sun may contains but a100 wavelets to arrive in one second of time, a billion such would blind us.
The higher the velocity at which light is instigated within a small area so much the greater its quantity of wavelets will be per line. The power of light, beneficial or destructive, is its rotation, for it is by rotation that warmth is produced. If thus 1000 atoms per second were impinging upon a turbine wheel to turn it at normal speed, how fast would it come to turn by 1.billions atoms per second in time? Here a demonstration of the power of the A/bomb.
And where can we find some evidence that at high rotational speed the magnetic figure of eight expands, if not by our high voltage lines strung all over the country to hang them so far from any conducting surface. For that is what electricity is, nothing more than a rotating magnetic field of force inhibited by and upon guides such as the metal wires, be they steel copper aluminum or gold.
How can electricity be a flow of none existent parts, when that is not just stupid but beyond all reasoning and comprehension, nothing more than a fantasy of fantasies. Nature itself teaches us that as we move a copper guide through a magnetic flux it twist these lines upon it, its very rotation rotates the lines as when a rubber band is twisted.
Consequently electricity is nothing more nor less than a magnetic field of force by its rotation, and since that rotation is in one the same rotational direction upon the entire line, the two ends of that line then with its center upon the generator will demonstrate two opposing directions of rotation, clockwise and counter clockwise.
These thus when brought together are like two grinding wheels tearing each other to pieces,. namely the spark of electricity, unless intermediate turns are used to compensate for their difference, like a transmission in an automobile.
The terms positive and negative thus are not real, but no more than a point of view, either can be called either. For why should clockwise be positive and counter clockwise be negative, it can just as well be the other way around. Positive is never positive other than by arbitrary classification of either end of a single circuit or single flow of movement, or single direction of movement
The format in iron has the capacity to retain a magnetic field wherefore it is also capable of conducting the same. Copper on the other hand for its particular format is able to conduct any rotating magnetic field but not arrest, to as such fasten upon it
The format by which plastic is held together does not have the capacity to physically conduct any magnetic field nor any rotational magnetic field, and thus serves as an insulator.
Magnetic verses magnetic, it comes in most any shape and form since as rigid as it may be it is also flexible, like our moon that resides some 240.000 miles from us, if the magnetic were not flexible that moon might only be some 190.000 miles from us, with no resulting tides upon the earth.
The flexibility of the magnetic lines thus is that they will bend and reformat their design, but not stretch, or if so it is to a minor degree. But not always so for when those figures of eight are spun around these lines do stretch evident from electricity at its high rate of rotation, and equally so with water into steam.
Velocity verses velocity, speed verses speed, how marvelous therefore that velocity alone changes things, like water into ice, for just think of this how these 3 magnets 2 of H, and 1 of O hold so well together that nothing but a high velocity of some 700+ degrees will drive them apart from one other.
Whereas at normal temperature those 3 magnets coupled together act as were they neutral to any other, not binding with them, but as the velocity of their rotational movement is decreased, then their polarity changes whereby they do come to adhere to one another forming ice.
All this by nothing more than a rate of speed, and equally so with the air that we breathe, at normal temperature, that is to say at normal speed, all these tiny pairs of magnets float around one another as if there is no magnetic polarity visible upon them, yet when the velocity is lowered upon them, these also change their polarities to bind to one another - clearly showing their magnetic properties.
The atom thus as a tiny magnet is a most marvelous innovation how in interaction with one another they show themselves neutral, and/or partially neutral, as well as fully engaged. And that can be singular as well as by multiples, like a grain of sand how so may atoms form that single grain, yet by its overall form it is neutral to all other grains.
Then there is the marvel of steel how well these magnets lock onto other another, even when super heated, these may lose their molecular formation flowing like a liquid, but the obvious expansion that should be upon them is curtailed by their multiple magnetic design acting as a brake towards that end.
And yet those magnetic atoms of steel do not join with steel upon steel as if neutral to one another, yet when heated to the point of flowing they do adhere to one another. Note thus how speed verses speed changes things magnetically, either hiding their polarities or showing them.
This to me is most marvelous how these tiny rotating magnetic entities come to adhere and/or connect by relative movement, by a rate of movement.
A hint: When there is the angular there is no linear no push pull, but that angular by a half wave turn (8) does present the linear the push pull, anywhere in between is the variation from zero linear to full linear. And this coupled with two or more presents a world of variations showing neutrality to full fledged magnets.
When experimenting with any type of metal there is hardly any neutral to be found other than their ability (coordinate) to retain the eight. Atoms vary from singular formation to multiple formations, like as from the light to the heavy, and it is by the heavy in their multiples that the lack of stability may be found, such as uranium.
Split a magnet and it will be 2 magnets Radiation is not just particles, but wave coordinates as well, then there are unstable atoms radiating harmful wave coordinates.
Breaking up a uranium atom is breaking up a magnet, its coordinate to divers formations. And like the coordinate of poison destroys other coordinates, so many divers coordinates are harmful to human tissue, some to tissue some to the nerves to rearrange.
The atom is not a solar system, nor is it easily broken up, only the heavier larger atoms with complicated coordinates can be broken up. The atom bomb does not break up the atoms of air, nor any lighter atoms but can rearrange molecular structure.
Yet it is possible to join the lighter elements to one another by pressure and/or velocity, that as such interprets into heat. And even so the greater atoms can formatted to new coordinates like steel into stainless, and carbon into diamond.
ATOM ** ATOM
By
Leonard Van Zanten – Riverside Ca. 92505
Essay
April 2019
Published by Journal of advances in physics,
entitled "Nature of the atom."
Abstract
The atom as a subject is the most difficult of all subjects and for its many variations extremely large and the most incomprehensive of all phenomena. Nor so I fear will we ever come to a full understanding of it, nor even the half thereof.
Yet we must make
a start somewhere to learn the principle fashion of its nature and operation
that for what I have seen is mostly misunderstood.
Keywords
Motion,
magnetic, atom,
Essay.
In
order to categorize what we are to discuss, first let us get into the nature
of the atom, then its nomenclature, and how it forms molecules. And we must
speak of the cornerstone, termed energy, as well as motion, and how by the
mere rate of movements atoms and molecules shift their polarities, and how
by some for a higher rate of movement molecules disband while others unite.
And so let us begin with:
The atomic nature
Considering all the phenomena in nature what parts will join with one another as well as stay aloof from one another? Our answer would be “Magnets.” But why just magnets when molecules also consist of parts holding onto one another, or we ourselves to mother earth?
We are not magnetic yet
it is by magnetic power that we are held to the earth. (Ref-1) Gravity is
but an inclination, the power of it belongs to magnetic, for we are not
drawn to just the earth, but to its very center, and only our magnetic force
provides the earth with that center. Two plus two therefore adds to four.
Then there is that electrical that we have placed in the atoms, giving it positive and negative parts as if these had an attraction to one another like unto the polarities of a magnet. But boy how wrong we are since that electrical all in itself in every possible way clearly shows us that its positive never at all attracts itself to any negative nor visa versa.
On the contrary, these when confronted with one another will
come to destroy one another.(Ref-2) That thus eliminates any electrical
in the atom and more than anything whereby they may join into molecules.
Then we decided to invent a new bird called “electromagnetic” to somehow justify that positive to adhere to the negative in the atom. But once one has given himself over a cliff he is not likely to make it look like as if he is not falling, gravity will not let him.
If anything we should have replaced those electrical polarities with the magnetic notations of north and south. But then gravity will accelerate us down from that cliff having to admit the atom to have a magnetic nature. And it’s a sin to agree with me.
But what is one sin more than another; the atom as a planetary system is
so widely accepted why should we wish to change it? But it does demand an
answer to two big questions, how any one planetary system can possibly join
with another? And where are its parts as single sided coins coming from?
Our
solar system does not work electrical, it is made up of full fledged
magnets; all planets as well as moons are full magnets along with the sun
having that unique capacity to hold onto one another. Yet none of them cling
at any close range, even while the sun pulls on all of them with its grant
magnetic coordinate. These planets then keep themselves from falling into
the sun by their velocity presenting sufficient inertia to balance out
against the pull.
The
magnetic moon.
It has been said or believed that our moon does not have a magnetic force like unto our earth. But that is self contradictory when we do give that moon a gravitational force of about 1/6th of the earth since it is a confirmed fact that gravity cannot exist without it’s magnetic man.
Then
there are the tides to refute it as these come about by the magnetic
tentacles of the moon (Ref-3) And no less Newton’s law of motion showing
gravity to be a local force with a very limited reach. (Ref-4) Conclusively
we have to keep our story straight.
Why
positive to negative show no attraction
Has anyone ever scrutinized the electrical potential? How for example when a wire is held next to a magnet that it will push and pull itself to that magnet at the rate of its voltage, it’s rate of rotation? And what does that prove if not that electricity is nothing other than a magnetic potential having a north and south polarity at its sides that as such rotate.
And no wonder that it rotates because we are causing those
rotations with the armature of our generators as we twist the straight
magnetic lines of the field coils over one another to become twisted
magnetic lines. (Ref-5)
And because the fundamental nature of magnetic is “curvature,” each single one of these twists show themselves as any magnet shows itself, full figure eights of force. But at its ends that electricity is not that peaceful for while that whole circuit rotates in but a single direction of rotation – when we curve the two end to face each other (positive to negative) these show themselves in opposite direction of rotation that by contact destroy one another.
We however found
a way around it by adding turns in between to serve as a transmission
between the two. That transmission then serves us for motors and
transformers, as well as light and heating elements.
While
thus it is a fact that there is a push pull from the electrical, it is only
so at its sides, not at its connecting ends. (Ref-2) Nor therefore can these
sides do what magnets are known for since these at all times rotate. They
can however cause to vibrate.
Nor is electricity electrical but magnetic, twins may have different names but their parents are the same. And for a word in wisdom, there is movement and movement, but for all that is motion - there are but two directions of movement linear and angular, straight or around, and that by any combination.
Since then these are most
fundamental there is angular inertia, and linear inertia both of which weigh
upon us for gravity. And no less for our movements unless one wishes to add
up and down, both of which are still linear. Waves likewise in the way they
travel are both angular and linear.
Nature is three-dimensional, with motion being singular having two directions of, then again most everything in nature is twofold starting with ourselves as man and woman. But this thing we must get away from, to think of electricity as electrical.
Magnetic is like stationary, while electric is magnetic the same but in rotation. As then the atom is magnetic yet rotates shall we therefore call it electrical? I suppose we may have a point, but no that is not the right way to do things, I just got through saying that electrical is magnetic all the same, as in fact that rotating magnetic is a derivative of the regular magnetic.
So no! We do not have a point - the atom as a rotating magnet
is still magnetic, only when we twist the lines of magnetic are we allowed
to keep the term of electric.
Electromagnetic
If electric is to be thought of different why not for electromagnetic, for that is like saying “magneticmagnetic”. And so what shall I say? I heard you the first time, why the repetition? Magnetic once is enough, for that is the reality of electromagnetic, a bird that does not exist, calling it twice by the same name does not make it a different bird, nor even two birds.
The pronunciation of that so-called word or thing is the same as saying “turningstraight”, or “angularlinear”.
The spell checker turns it down as not
spelled right, it’s supposed to be two words, the two directions of the
single movement. The reality is magnetic either straight or angular,
either stationary or rotating. No educated person will believe upon single
sided coins, very well knowing how these things aside of not existing,
cannot possibly exist. Wherefore protons and electrons never even made it to
the atom.
Nature
of energy
I
should make a quotation: “In
physics, energy is the quantitative property that must be transferred to an
object in order to perform work on, or to heat, the object. Energy is a
conserved quantity; the law of conservation of energy states that energy can
be converted in form, but not created or destroyed.”
We do have an idea – but no statement as to what energy really is, and how am I to make it real for us? If I say that the spark on the top of a cylinder is energy, it will make no sense. So thus let us go to a golf course. Here is the ball on the ground, it has no energy, it is just a ball on the ground.
But then with a club we
smite upon it to the ninth hole, and yes now it has energy because it is
moving, it for all its energy can even kill someone if it strikes him on the
head. Its motion is its energy,
and our striking at it was the transfer of our energy upon it.
When
you see gasoline as a liquid it has no energy, it’s just a liquid good for
nothing unless we add energy to it. We cannot really turn that gasoline
into energy, yet we can produce energy by it. But what talk is this of
me to keep saying energy, when it is always motion, and motion only, for
that is what we are after, we want motion; the motion of the piston moving
down, we could care less about the rest, as long as that piston moves we
have what we want.
And so let us put some gasoline on top of that cylinder. Then to ignite it we use a spark, but nothing happens, why not? We are prone to say that its energy wont release for us, but of course not, it does not contain energy, its just a liquid or gas, and even though we did introduce some energy, namely the spark, it refused to work to our satisfaction.
But how was that
spark energy? It was so because it was a movement, a high movement in
rotation, namely our so-called electricity that is nothing more than a flow
of magnetic at high speed. In order thus to have energy something has to
move because only movement is energy, “it” only has the ability to
work, to perform work.
How therefore are we to make that liquid or gas alive to provide us with movement? The atoms of that liquid are formed into molecules and they rotate, and that rotation as such is energy because rotation is a movement.
If then we can increase the speed of that rotation, their magnetic fields will come to expand, and that expansion being movement adds yet more movement demanding more room that in turn moves the piston down. Since then the spark alone did not do the trick other than to warm it up a little, we need an additive.
And God created just such a thing called the oxygen atom/molecule, a very peculiar atom to form in pairs with a coordinate perfectly suited to make things alive that is to cause to restructure and or rearrange molecular formations, also said; to react with.
With that additive
the reaction by and with the high movement of the spark comes to increase
the rotational speed of the atoms of the gaseous molecules at the same
instant when the gas molecules are broken up forming CO2 and H2O.
Cornerstone
The process starts with motion, - produces motion, - and ends with motion. In order to obtain movement it must be instigated by the same, like hitting that golf ball, human power transferred upon a ball. Or that spark as a high rate of conductive movement instigating a chain reaction at essentially the speed of light, first raising the rate of the oxygen atoms that then by its conductive movements conducts it upon the gas molecules whereby these are broken up, normally called combustion.
It is not only in the break up of the
molecules that these demand more room. (The smaller part of the expansion.)
The primary demand for more room is by the atoms themselves as these
are near instantly driven to a high rotation. And their magnetic fields
rotating with them these expand driving each and every atom from one
another.
The
best part in gasoline thus are the hydrogen atoms since the lighter the
elements so much the greater the expansion will be. And it’s because of
its conductive nature that one movement at high speed brings another
movement to high speed, and that to us is like in an instant, near instant
acceleration.
I placed this heading as: “Cornerstone.” And that holds true for most everything whereby a great deal of energy (motion) is released. For a ten story building resting on a cornerstone the power of the destructive force is not in the cornerstone, but in the collapse of the building.
Equally so with the atomic or hydrogen bomb the uranium, is like the cornerstone, or like the spark in the cylinder also being a cornerstone. The greatest of all fires can be started with but a single spark. Wherefore it is not in a small amount of uranium where all the power or energy resides, but in what is instigated by them to their surroundings.
It is not the
uranium to level a city, but the superheated air. Or a quake in the ocean
that does no more than setup a water wave, that wave then when like a bear
driven into a corner, will come out fighting - to level the seashore.
Energy is never anything but movement, as then it is and can be transferred it is never conserved. Man’s law pertaining to that is quite wrong. Motion can be started and stopped without being transferred. A vehicle can move as well as be idle, its reduction in movement then is not transferred to the brakes, since these will cool down, and be like before.
The same for
warmth when cooler air comes to lower the rotational movement of the atoms
in the warmer air by their conductive nature they are simply slowed down,
nothing is conserved. The sunlight upon the earth is never conserved, it
instigates warmth and growth, but that will slow down again and end their
growth. Motion can be sped up and slowed with or without
conservation, be it the wind or the atom or molecule in their rotation.
There
is but one movement that never slows and can never be slowed down,
nor even be reacted upon by anything, yet it reacts upon everything as it
powers all nature, the one great fundamental movement that is an
entity in itself, while no other motion nor movement being so
fundamental, but derivatives of the first fundamental entity, that is ever directionally
conductive the nature of which is best known as magnetic, with my
notation for it as 3M.
Forces
How many forces do we know? The wind, the water, man’s strength, and so there are more to be named. But none of these rank among the fundamental ones, the ones to provide for the first of all motion. “The first of all motion”; so I said, for there is no other force than motion, there exist no other force than motion.
Reality, so I aim to impress upon
everyone. What is the sense of a strong force or a weak force, or even a
nuclear force, when no name nor composition, nor nomenclature is given? It
means nothing to say “strong” when the name of that gorilla is not
given. And so I surmised we have no idea what in fact the fundamental forces
in nature are, or else we would not have said, strong nor weak, nor nuclear.
As
then I spoke of two things fundamental I named but one, and for good reason.
But why should I name it when it should not be of me. And so; think of
anything that is power or force, anything at all with the ability to procure
things, to perform work, to get things moving, or to hold things together.
What is our answer? Our own dictionary gives us the answer, namely
“Motion.”
There is nothing whatsoever in or upon the atom, or molecule to bind them together than the simplicity of motion. No other force or entity exists. But of course I must now reveal this wisdom that – that particular motion, is not just any motion, but something most fundamental to be an entity in itself.
An always existing movement that cannot be removed, nor slowed down, nor sped up. It starts out with eternity, the meaning of which is something without beginning and without end that I may illustrate by a circle.
The movement in a circle always returns to where it started. There is no entry in a circle, no opening, and it shows or contains but one single direction, the angular format, the linear that we know so well is missing.
Therefore in order to have birth of it – when that circle is turned by one half it comes to resemble the figure of eight, the typical format of magnetic, that then gives birth to linear movement. (Ref-2)
But what comes next is equally in wisdom, that this most fundamental movement is conductive, and at that directionally conductive – wherefore, and whereby magnets are drawn together as well as draw away from each other. I then am speaking of magnetism; for that is the term we have given it.
I then
gave it the notation 3M. I had people telling me that I was wrong in
asserting that the format of magnetic is by an eight rather than two
circles, even though I presenting undeniable evidence; the tides upon the
earth is one such. (Ref-3) I
know the old saying that one can lead a horse to water but not make him
drink, if then we die of thirst do not blame me.
Contrary to some I at least am providing the full nomenclature of the force that I am placing upon the atom, name inclusive. A name that we all know for a force, a movement that presents linear as well as angular movement, with this obvious line between the lines that there is no other direction of movement.
All things essentially being dual or twofold it stands to reason that it
might be so for the fundamental of all things as well. And yes so it is, but
first let us grasp what can be understood before we dive too deep where one
might get the bends.
Does
it not make good sense for that fundamental motion to exist just as I have
said? It is found with all magnets and with all the waves of the spectrum,
and no less for its derivative called electric. That always existing
movement did not just fall out of the sky, it was created by Him who made
the countless many stars. To Him belongs the honor and my honor.
Expansion
We know what expansion is, and sometimes see it, it appears as steam, a drop of water into many times its volume. But more obvious are those high power lines strung all over the country that for the high rotation of their magnetic field must be hung on long porcelain holders.
But no less for a
high rotation of the magnetic fields of the atoms of the water molecule as
to how and why steam comes to take up so much volume. The one and only
way whereby any spinning atom is able to demand more room is with and by a
magnetic field, that typical figure eight of force.
Expansion is also seen in ice from water, and though it is from and by magnetic – that expansion is not in the rate of rotation, nor by the reduction in their rate of rotation, but simply in the formation of the grid. When baking bread or making pancakes the increased rate of the atomic movement turns liquid into a somewhat expanded solid.
Add baking powder and buttermilk and it will
become fluffy, adding air holes within the grid. Rates of movement
restructures molecules and turns them into grids, but it can also destroy
grids, for so there are ten thousand and one variations all by rates of
movement. Since then nature
shows itself in the nature of magnetic – why not accept it as such?
Rate
of movement
Have we ever wondered how or why water turns into ice, or steam, and even separate into its two components? And how and by what these two components come to reunite again? This one example in itself tells us a lot about nature in how and why it comes about.
At room temperature those three atoms hold together by their magnetic movements, all atoms indeed being like unto magnets, but very special magnets, more unique than anything I can possibly name. Figure 1 is a crude illustration of one of the simplest of atoms with figure 3 a representation of our familiar H2O.
A regular magnet placed on a table presents but a single movement, the 3M, while with the atom there are always 2 to 4 forms of movement associated with it. The 3M in figure 1 is its one and only fundamental movement the typical figure eight of movement that as such is classified magnetic.
Additionally that atom may or may not spin, but when it does, or let me say, is allowed to spin; or forced to spin; that format of 3M rotates along with it even when it is joined with others. That movement - or energy if you will - is not classified fundamental, nor any of its further movements, like a vibration, or oscillation when push/pulled upon, or turning along with the whole of the molecule.
Figure
1: From one to five movements associated with the atom.
Atoms at different temperatures have the ability to mask their polarities, how precisely is a good question, I know only a little of it. But this much is sure when the rate of movement upon the water molecule is increased; the 3M of each of them expanding - it consequently drives the 3 atoms further from one another, the liquid taking on a gaseous form known as steam.
And with
still higher and higher velocities their fields are stretched so far to
break loose from one another. Normally we speak of heating, since then heat
is movement in the rate thereof, motion can be used as another term for
heat.
It
took a great deal of heat to break up the water molecule into its two
components, but it takes an even higher rate of motion to recombine them.
The spark or flame that will instigate the reunion has a much greater
velocity that at virtually the speed of light instigates a chain reaction
from atom to atom raising their rotational speed to its own speed, with this
result greatly increasing their 3M (magnetic field). The hydrogen bomb is
evidence to that effect.
Those two hydrogen atoms then can also sliced off from that oxygen atom without any heat by a rotating magnetic field, that is to say, between the two ends of a rotating magnetic field also known as electricity.
Here the two ends of
that circuit turning in opposite rotation of one another have a neat way to
slice atom from atom, to separate water into its two components.
If now only we could do that at the top of a cylinder without blowing
ourselves up, we could use water for a fuel, more potent than gasoline.
I call it curious that at such extreme expansion the two components reunite two to one, and immediately afterwards their rate of movement drops down to what we perceive as room temperature; mere H2O. (Conservation is none existent here) When they were together the high rate broke up their love scene, while the still higher rate did reunite them.
As then we may not quite understand that, it’s nonetheless a fact in nature seen in various ways. One is with the hydrogen bomb, the element of hydrogen being the perfect agent by which to obtain a great deal of energy, it being the lightest has the greatest expansion of all.
The more hydrogen we can cram into a fuel so
much more downward push we can have at the pistons. Joining hydrogen to
oxygen is more powerful than any gasoline. I learned that the hard way in my
experiments.
But now comes an even more curious part how when the rate of movement upon these 3 atoms is slowed down to what we call freezing – these little rascals alter their magnetic polarities whereby to lock onto other molecules forming into grids known as ice.
Just previously the directions of their magnetic
polarity held them together very well while masking their adhesive power to
all other atoms. And thus by no more than slowing down that internal
movement, (their spin along with the 3M,) shifted the overall magnetic
coordinate enabling the oxygen to instead of two points - present three
points whereby to adhere to others, and each hydrogen atom opened up like
unto regular magnets.
All atoms then at all times have the ability to adhere at four points, its north and south along with the two equatorial regions. And that can be increased to six points vertical and horizontal, and that while it spins obvious in all types of grids.
That oxygen atom in ice has 4 points in the horizontal, 3 of them adhering to other atoms while number 4 keeps it aloof from others creating those openings in the grid, whereby ice takes up a little more room, illustrated by figure 2. Additionally these presents 2 more points in the vertical.
Note the polarity in all of them to form such grids, the six oxygen atoms driving themselves into a hexagon by like polarities.
Figure 2: H2O by magnetic power formed to a grid
So what do we think of our oxygen atom to present itself with six points around the sphere of it - able to join and/or maintain itself at a distance from others, and yet again like in air mask all of its polarities to adhere to none other. It does all that by various rates of movement, that yes, and we must include its surroundings, by what type of atoms it is next to, or in contact with.
When it meets silicon atoms the oxygen atom comes to
appear like regular magnets, and while our oxygen atom in the air shows no
polarities, yet it takes but a tiny spark (a high movement) for it to open
up and restructure other molecules like those of benzene etc.
A most remarkable atom that one of oxygen, more than any atom that I would love to have a full understanding of. If anyone is able to show just how these molecules either mask and shift their magnetic polarities to perform all these feats, I am all ears, for to me the atom is most astounding to as magnetic agents form all that is in nature.
And it cannot be anything else in nature, seeing no force nor
movement is as unique as the eight of magnetic. No strong, nor weak,
nor any other force is needed to perform what the eight of magnetic is
capable of. It quells everything within its embrace, maintaining a strong
solid atom without any other part or force needed.
Since then these appear in a whole variety of formats from single to multiples in one, so it is that butter is parted at the touch while steel must be cut by others of like complexity. The atom of steel is another fascinating subject, how it for its complex magnetic formation hold so well together that when heated – its fields attempting to expand are prevented by its own complex nature, or coordinate as I should say.
Elements like gold and silver, or
copper etc, do not serve well for a fuel only because these do not expand as
the lighter elements. But then these serve another purpose also needed.
Accordingly it is each for its own to serve all. A wisdom we often forget.
The H2O Molecule
Figure 3 illustrates the molecule of water as I visualize its coordinate. Is then the atom of oxygen in water single or dual? For how in air being dual does it come to be single at other times? And by 3 in one it is poisonous by virtue of its now new coordinate that is harmful to humans. One hydrogen atom now connects with an outgoing movement while the second by its ingoing movement.
Since then it seems to me that there should be some polarity open for others to connect to at the bottom ends of the two hydrogen atoms – reality shows me in error. Only when their overall movement is slowed down to the point of freezing do these ends join, otherwise they are masked preventing other molecules from joining with it.
The ideal at the top of the oxygen atom/molecule being masked is more easily understood, in that by their dual nature in air when it is in the company of nitrogen atom/molecules are always masked. Yet when confronted with silicone and many other elements it readily reacts, but not without some instigation.
But then again as it is transported by our bloodstream it reacts with the cells in our bodies without any apparent instigation. If then we truly wish to understand nature stick with magnetic in the atom also since electrical or anything else would destroy the atom, or in the first place never come to exist. And yes I do know more but let us first grasp what is real in nature.
Figure 3. The water molecule after its lines of conductive movements.
And
so how shall we redraw this molecule in the nature of magnetic? Who is
competent enough to understand the atom as it really is in its many forms
and coordinates to perform all that is found in nature? No doubt an endless
subject but most rewarding, I for one am at its threshold, as yet from the
outside looking in.
What
is a charge?
Shall we call it mis-apprehension or that the Almighty One withheld knowledge from us because we did not honor Him as He is to be honored for our very life and being? We have the habit of saying; that something is charged. That is like saying how Henry took it from me, but - “what” - did Henry take from me, was it green cheese or a Martian? For if we cannot specify what a charge is, we ought not pronounce the word.
If
acceleration creates a charge then the acceleration “is” the
charge, since to accelerate is an increase in a rate of movement. That
thus comes down to motion, the motion of the part, and how does that
create what we fail to mention? If somehow we come to mention electricity,
it takes two to tangle, where thus are the lines of power to be twisted over
one another? It takes rotation to come to twist, and twist what?
And
how is it that we come to say that “acceleration” creates a charge?
Will it ever come to a stop? Must not that which accelerates come to
a final? According to our
vocabulary these parts forever accelerating must now be traveling at
a trillion times the speed of light.
And why should we even want any electricity in the atom when as a standing entity it does not do anything, like as if it does not even exist. But once the circle is completed it will destroy itself unless we appease them with a transmission, that for its nature can only be done by turns and more turns, either an already rotating movement or physical turns. (Ref-5)
Where then is
that transmission within the atom? We are better off with a magnetic nature,
even though it may be difficult to grasp, it’s the only thing available
whereby nature may be formed. Any other theory or ideal is impossible to
grasp or even come upon.
Single
sided coins
If a particle moves or accelerates it has a coming and going does it not? Or anything that moves has a coming and going that as such we came to look upon as positive for the one end, with negative for its other end. It does not matter which end is called which, since these terms are no more than a point of view for a single entity. Not just any entity in that for magnets it is called north and south, while our chair has a top and bottom.
Our legs then are beneath with our head held upwards. But how is one
to have any single thing with just one end, or a sheet of paper with no
bottom? Think about it and forget about only positive or only negative,
seeing there has never been such a thing, nor ever will be. Each term
exists because it is simultaneous and in conjunction with the other of a
single entity.
Power of magnetic
Figure
4 illustrates a molecule of gasoline consisting of 5 carbon atoms with
hydrogen atoms bonded to the outer 4, The quest then becomes how these bond
to one another after the manner in nature where all things are by movement
into movement by coordinates.
Figure 4 Gas molecule locked magnetically
By atom 3 the direction of its internal movement is incoming from the south and outgoing on the right and the top called the north. From here atom 3 with its conductive motion bonds directly to the center atom as well as to the right atom 2, as well as to atom 1, and again to atom 4.
Each single atom thus helps to bond
all five one to the other. In the overall view two of the five atoms
act as a south, or negative passing over the center atom towards to the
remaining two as were they the north, or positive end of this entire
molecule.
And when an oxygen atom at high movement is directed at them it will break up that magnetic hold – restructuring it. But the power of it all rests with the near instant expansion of their magnetic fields – during the restructuring – by the increase in their rotation.
The “real” power in our internal combustion engines thus is “magnetic.” Then consider the high current at those wires strung on those large power poles.
That current not only rotates at the clip of a quarter million rotations (volts) each second, but reverses its rotation for the half thereof – also at the same rate. (AC current) How agile therefore magnetic is. And yet that rotation is but a snails pace compared to its linear velocity at 300,000/km/s.
Consequently all the movement upon the atom is slow compared
to the speed of its “Fundamental Movement,” its – “first of all
movement.”
Then to have a look at the atom in figure 5, how complex can a magnetic field be? When we view or experiment with any of our available magnets, we are only dealing with the most simplest of all, usually showing no more than its first movement unless we put it in a drill to start rotating it. For this is what the atom does without a drill.
But then I may be getting myself
in hot water to get too deeply into how and why the atoms spins, or their
fields upon them. I may have hinted at the twofold nature of just about
everything in nature inclusive that most fundamental one called magnetic
that in reality is a movement all its own, but then in going further I made
an oath.
Figure
5. 6 Atoms in multiple formation real,
but hard to comprehend.
I did however wish to show the multiple coordinates that can and does exist upon many atoms fueled by the first of all movements. The illustration figure 5 appears like 2 figure eights offset by 90 degrees where from A to B the North with from C to D the south.
Or if we follow the
internal line of motion from 1 to 8 it is a single movement, one that always
returns from where it started like any and all magnetic movements always do.
One may be skeptical of the atom in figure 5, but more complex variations
can be drawn quite realistically.
When we look at the grids of many compound elements it’s obvious how atoms can and will join at as many as 4 to 6 points simultaneously. That therefore cannot be done with any hydrogen atom, its coordinate being too simple. The internal structure of the larger atoms do present its coordinate in what appears to us as multiples.
And if by its design that
coordinate becomes unstable it will work tirelessly to rectify itself. It
then does so mostly with the help of other coordinates it can come in
contact with. If then our oxygen and nitrogen atoms in their dual nature
were unable to mask their polarities to others our air would be solid – as
it is when cooled to a very low temperature.
And
what more is there to say in this endless subject to get to know the atom?
No doubt many will work on it to man’s gain, I have only made a
start.
Conclusion
The
atom for its magnetic nature may appear as a whole new concept, but it’s
the only concept of any reality. The many facts and observations in nature
only disprove the atom as currently taught. If then we backtrack to
simplicity we will find the magnetic atom a most rewarding subject.
References
Ref-1:
https://cirworld.com/index.php/jap/article/view/8164
Ref-2:
http://recentscientific.com/magnetic-and-electric
Ref-3:
https://cirworld.com/index.php/jap/article/view/8114
Ref-4:
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5863
Ref-5:http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/%7B$cat_name%7D/View/6071